Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming internet sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but perhaps not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is certainly one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just wandered in very calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second among these two stories is just a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a gambling store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate utilizing the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of money,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit more chilli slot machine play free over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is related to the idea that neighboring communities could be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of prospects who have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be based in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to your proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it could have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the opportunity for three brand new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed if the gambling enterprises and regional governments can’t come to a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed having a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston world survey found that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with only two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state while the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large number of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local streets of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back in the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect aided by the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not any longer head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their office had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.