Rep. Frank Pallone Requests Daily Fantasy Operators Reveal Participating NFL Players

Rep. Fr<span id="more-3900"></span>ank Pallone Requests Daily Fantasy Operators Reveal Participating NFL Players

US Rep. Frank Pallone wants more transparency from day-to-day fantasy operators DraftKings and FanDuel, the New Jersey politician authoring letters this week seeking the launch of personal functional information to the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

United states of america Representative Frank Pallone (D-New Jersey) is petitioning fantasy that is daily (DFS) market leaders DraftKings and FanDuel to reveal players in the National Football League that have actually active records and are also participating in contests on those sites.

It’s the latest development in the DFS saga associated with last thirty days, a timespan that is probably felt like an eternity for executives at the industry’s two largest platforms.

Pallone delivered letters to both companies on behalf of the Energy and Commerce Committee asking for the names of players, coaches, referees, staff member, owners, and also training personnel that have participated in DFS over the final year.

He also seeks the monies that are total by said group, and their net winnings or losses.

‘ The deep involvement of professional sports with day-to-day fantasy recreations raises questions regarding whether these practices are truly distinguishable from prohibited sports wagering along with other kinds of gambling,’ Pallone had written.

National Fantasy League

Pallone is straight seeking the NFL because unlike the NBA, MLB and NHL, the body that is governing of has not publicly condemned its players and associates from partaking in daily fantasy games.

‘The NFL is the actual only real major US sports league which has perhaps not barred its athletes,’ Pallone expanded.

The NFL does however stipulate that players and personnel cannot accept prizes exceeding $250 in virtually any soccer fantasy competition.

Along with seeking out of the names of those associated towards the NFL playing DFS, Pallone also desires information on what DraftKings and FanDuel goes about notifying other leagues including the NCAA when an athlete or colleague tries to enter a competition they participate directly.

Pallone wishes to help make the process of just how individuals are tracked knowledge that is public.

‘Do each of these leagues provide a list to your company of league and team workers from which to cross-check your system?’ Pallone asks. ‘Explain in detail the procedure by which your company offers the NFL with information regarding prizes won by NFL and team personnel so the NFL can determine whether they have accepted prizes over $250.’


Pallone presumably knows the responses to many of the relevant concerns he’s posing. The unregulated nature of daily fantasy has led to rather minimal oversights in all likelihood.

Additionally, you could argue that it isn’t necessarily the job of DraftKings and FanDuel to mandate rules dictated by outside agencies just like the NFL and impose a $250 reward limitation.

The cold hard truth is that the NFL probably doesn’t much care if your player wins a few hundred dollars while playing daily dream competitions.

The league is a shareholder of FanDuel, and several team owners including the Patriots’ Robert Kraft and Cowboys tycoon Jerry Jones have stakes in DraftKings.

‘From my viewpoint, anything that follows the rules, that causes and creates more interest and much more fan involvement, I’m really for,’ Jones told ESPN this week. ‘I do not think DraftKings or FanDuel in any way compromise our players on the football field because it’s all dream.’

A multibillion-dollar industry can rarely be called ‘fantasy,’ but so goes the ongoing puzzling climate of day-to-day fantasy activities.

NFL Forced to Defend Anti-Sports Betting Stance Following Games in London

84,000 people flocked to watch two underwhelming NFL teams duke it out at London’s Wembley Stadium. The NFL says it remains easily against sports wagering despite the fact that dozens of wagering shops are situated a stone’s throw away. (Image:

The NFL had been facing accusations of hypocrisy this week over its incursion that is much-publicized into UK.

On Sunday, 84,000 people turned up to London’s Wembley Stadium, usually the reserve of the England soccer team, to watch the Jacksonville Jaguars face off against the Buffalo Bills, hardly prime time viewing for even the most fevered of football fans.

The league is wanting to measure the appeal of the game in the UK as it mulls the possibility of launching a London franchise, as well as the sold-out stadium will come as being a pleasant surprise to NFL commissioner Robert Goodel.

It suggests, somewhat surprisingly, that there is indeed a large appetite in the British for a sport that numerous Brits still prefer to refer to mischievously as ‘hand-egg.’

But so how exactly does this square with the NFL’s trenchant anti-gambling stance?

It in fact was a concern posed by Yahoo Sports’ Dan Wetzel this week, who was in town for the game and observed that in britain shops that are betting ‘as common as bakeries.’

Hangover from the Forties and Fifties

‘In London you can not go more than two town blocks without finding a wagering parlor, usually a little storefronts about the size of a newsstand that is old’ he marveled. ‘ There are two main throughout the street from my hotel.

One is next to a Subway. It is so integrated into daily life that it is very nearly impossible to imagine it could be contrary to the law in the usa.

‘It’s fun. It’s simple. It’s protected. The NFL is there. NBA. College football. It is perhaps not even as daunting as dealing with a sports that are major in Vegas. It is incredibly easy and inviting,’ he included. ‘Sports wagering is not just legal here; it is easy and convenient. The British […] sometime ago understood that folks like to bet on sports and prohibiting it is fruitless and pointless.’

The NFL’s distaste for gambling is most likely a hangover from the forties and fifties, if the sport was affected by match-fixing scandals.

However, today, the league’s support of daily dream recreations has, in the eyes of many, undermined its position and has opened it up to accusations that it has abandoned its scruples in the search of profit.

‘Legalized gambling is an element of the culture in that country and now we are comfortable conforming with [sic] the social norms of where we play,’ NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told NBC Sports when asked concerning the relationship that is uneasy the league the UK’s liberal gambling laws.

‘We Don’t Determine the Laws’

Goodel was forced to answer the very question that is same a court of legislation when, three years ago, the major sports leagues established legal action to prevent nj-new jersey from legalizing sports gambling at its racetracks and casinos.

‘Well, we are playing within their country, we are coming to them,’ he reasoned. ‘And we’re only here for the period that is short of; we’re there for two or three times. It is not what we choose, it’s not that which we believe is within the best interests of activities, but we don’t dictate the guidelines or the laws.’

Nevada recently declared day-to-day dream sports to be gambling and asserted that operators must apply for the sports betting license in an effort to continue operating in the state.

Meanwhile, New Jersey is unlikely to offer the sports leagues any favors within the light of their constant derailment of its intends to regulate sports betting, and will probably follow Nevada’s suit.

Except that New Jersey will not be able to license DFS sports betting because the leagues have, up to now, prohibited them from regulating activities betting.

The NFL’s foray into London is making a mockery of its anti-sports betting stance, and increasing calls for fantasy sports become defined as sports gambling, pure and simple, are further undermining its arguments.

As time goes on the league’s position may become a lot more tough to defend.

Poker Players Alliance Rails Against New RAWA Threat

Marco Rubio has said that he would support a poker carve-out for RAWA, but this doesn’t seem to be an option for Sheldon Adelson. (Image:

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) is asking its supporters to their attorney generals to counter the threat that is latest from RAWA and its supporters.

The PPA warned this that Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster and South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson are trying to drum up support for the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) among the judiciary week.

In a letter week that is last the Congressional Judiciary Committee Leadership, Koster and Wilson asked your body to aid RAWA and demanded other lawyer generals lend their backing to the initiative.

‘DOJ’s revised interpretation of the Wire Act launched the entranceway to expansive Internet gambling and has had significant impacts that are negative our states from money laundering to exploitation of young ones to helping finance terrorist organizations,’ proclaims the letter.

‘Additionally,’ it continues, ‘the expansion of online gambling has undermined state and local law enforcement efforts to outlaw gambling which is prohibited in numerous states. As a result, we urge Congress to adopt the Restoration of America’s Wire Act.’

On the web Gambling is ‘Interstate’

The letter ignores the geolocation technology utilized by the three states that have managed thus far. Indeed, the crux of its argument relies on the premise that online gaming is essentially ‘interstate’ in its nature, because ‘states are ill-equipped to enforce gambling rules against interstate and worldwide organizations, specially when age and location verification mechanisms are subject to compromise therefore the technological vulnerabilities of the Internet.’

Hence, it reasons, online gambling can only be regulated by Congress and not by specific states.

The Poker Players Alliance responded in sort this week by rallying its supporters to pen letters of the own, denouncing RAWA.

The organization has also supplied a letter template for the people quick on time, which accuses the legislation to be a ‘federal land grab’ and of ‘stripping our state of the right to license, regulate, and sometimes even allow on-line poker, online lottery sales, and online casino-style games in your boundaries.’

‘This is maybe not a partisan issue. Organizations from both edges regarding the aisle oppose this legislation, like the Governors that is democratic Association the National Council of State Legislatures, Fraternal Order of Police, Americans for Tax Reform and the Competitive Enterprise Institute are outspoken opponents of these bills,’ it states.

Rubio Supports Poker Carve Out

It also highlights the fact that RAWA backers are not able to determine an instance that is single of play since the geo-location measures utilized by the regulated states are hugely effective.

Interested parties can access the template right here

In associated news, presidential hopeful and RAWA supporter Marco Rubio has said that a carve-out would be supported by him for online poker.

‘On the issue of Internet poker, the only difference between the poker games and others is he told the Las Vegas Review Journal that it involves an element of skill associated with and compared with just a slot machine online.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *